workaday Wednesday
Jun. 11th, 2025 07:34 amYesterday a department director (not mine) sent me a message asking how many times a certain thing happened last year. And I was like: ...
Meanwhile, my brain was all:
*how would I know that?
*what is a tactful way to say 'that thing is managed by your team, so shouldn't they be the ones keeping records on it?'
*I might be able to search my way back through emails and give an estimate?
*but all the emails would have come from your team! you could ask them!
*what in the world do you even need that information for?
Finally I gave as careful an answer as I could, and offered up a [measurable, replicable] search filter for documents (my actual job, lol). I layered it with caveats of low accuracy and non-inclusiveness.
The director: That's exactly what I'm looking for, but only do it if it will take less than ten minutes.
[NOTE: It had already taken considerably more than ten minutes, which could not have been more obvious from the time stamps of the messages we were exchanging.]
In conclusion: I sent the data anyway.
Meanwhile, my brain was all:
*how would I know that?
*what is a tactful way to say 'that thing is managed by your team, so shouldn't they be the ones keeping records on it?'
*I might be able to search my way back through emails and give an estimate?
*but all the emails would have come from your team! you could ask them!
*what in the world do you even need that information for?
Finally I gave as careful an answer as I could, and offered up a [measurable, replicable] search filter for documents (my actual job, lol). I layered it with caveats of low accuracy and non-inclusiveness.
The director: That's exactly what I'm looking for, but only do it if it will take less than ten minutes.
[NOTE: It had already taken considerably more than ten minutes, which could not have been more obvious from the time stamps of the messages we were exchanging.]
In conclusion: I sent the data anyway.
workaday Wednesday
May. 21st, 2025 07:44 amOh, right, the summer schedule. The schedule we follow in the summer. The schedule specifically designed to be used between Memorial Day and Labor Day. That schedule?
::checks notes scribbled on hand::
Yes, I'm definitely doing--
::squints at notes::
Work! Yes, I'm definitely doing work. Right now. Because it's the summer schedule!
(Okay, I forgot to clock in early today. I was thinking about work, though!)
::checks notes scribbled on hand::
Yes, I'm definitely doing--
::squints at notes::
Work! Yes, I'm definitely doing work. Right now. Because it's the summer schedule!
(Okay, I forgot to clock in early today. I was thinking about work, though!)
workaday Thursday
May. 15th, 2025 08:01 amMy workplace has decided to call all "local" employees back to the office two days a week. (Where "local" is within a certain mileage radius, a radius I am UNFORTUNATELY just barely inside.) It doesn't start until September, so my brain has of course decided THIS is the thing to focus on right now.
At first I was pretty concerned, because the company makes all their decisions based on one thing: PROFIT. And calling employees back to the office does not increase revenue or decrease costs in any obvious way. It seems POSSIBLE that the goal is to make long-time (aka well-paid) employees who've grown accustomed to working from home quit, and then either not replace them at all, or replace them with lower-paid employees who will be more desperate, given the absolute nightmare of the job market right now.
But that's a pretty complex plan for a company that decided to pour resources into the brilliant marketing strategy of 'change the color of the cap on the bottles.' And I think there's a non-zero chance that I've forgotten the not-so-secret third reason the company does things: someone with power acting for the sake of acting.
Because the company got a new CEO late last year, and now THIS year the first quarter wasn't as successful as predicted. (I can't even begin to express what a surprise this should NOT have been to anyone.) But I'm 10,000% sure that the new CEO has been getting enormous pressure from THEIR bosses (parent company and grandparent company) to FIX THINGS. I assume they've been hearing WHAT IS YOUR ACTION PLAN TO TURN THIS AROUND??? fairly constantly.
And I guess I can understand that the new CEO would like an answer other than 'this seems pretty normal actually, probably we shouldn't upend everything that's been working for five years' so what better action plan than to rearrange thedeck desk chairs? ESPECIALLY when it can be classified as "aligning" with the policies of the parent company? Action taken, egos soothed all around, new CEO can pat themselves on the back for a job well done.
At first I was pretty concerned, because the company makes all their decisions based on one thing: PROFIT. And calling employees back to the office does not increase revenue or decrease costs in any obvious way. It seems POSSIBLE that the goal is to make long-time (aka well-paid) employees who've grown accustomed to working from home quit, and then either not replace them at all, or replace them with lower-paid employees who will be more desperate, given the absolute nightmare of the job market right now.
But that's a pretty complex plan for a company that decided to pour resources into the brilliant marketing strategy of 'change the color of the cap on the bottles.' And I think there's a non-zero chance that I've forgotten the not-so-secret third reason the company does things: someone with power acting for the sake of acting.
Because the company got a new CEO late last year, and now THIS year the first quarter wasn't as successful as predicted. (I can't even begin to express what a surprise this should NOT have been to anyone.) But I'm 10,000% sure that the new CEO has been getting enormous pressure from THEIR bosses (parent company and grandparent company) to FIX THINGS. I assume they've been hearing WHAT IS YOUR ACTION PLAN TO TURN THIS AROUND??? fairly constantly.
And I guess I can understand that the new CEO would like an answer other than 'this seems pretty normal actually, probably we shouldn't upend everything that's been working for five years' so what better action plan than to rearrange the
oh, Tuesday
May. 13th, 2025 07:50 am(Extremely tempted to write "oh Tuesday, we're really in it now!" and leave it at that.)
But ACTUALLY I attended an extremely 'why are we here and what is the purpose of this meeting' work meeting yesterday, and was left more baffled at the end than the beginning. Still have no idea what the purpose of the meeting was.
It did, however, include an extended baseball metaphor which I did not follow AT ALL. Something about winning? Or maybe losing? Or maybe winning after a losing streak? It was definitely about baseball. Other than that, I've got nothing.
The total failure of this metaphor to communicate with me in any meaningful way is still making me laugh today.
But ACTUALLY I attended an extremely 'why are we here and what is the purpose of this meeting' work meeting yesterday, and was left more baffled at the end than the beginning. Still have no idea what the purpose of the meeting was.
It did, however, include an extended baseball metaphor which I did not follow AT ALL. Something about winning? Or maybe losing? Or maybe winning after a losing streak? It was definitely about baseball. Other than that, I've got nothing.
The total failure of this metaphor to communicate with me in any meaningful way is still making me laugh today.
'neither agree nor disagree'
May. 6th, 2025 07:41 amI took an 'employee engagement' survey yesterday (semi-required by work, in the sense that it's 'strongly encouraged,' and also why not? if I'm willing to write about my work feelings online, I feel like I should be willing to write about them on a survey).
But of course it wasn't a survey with a lot of nuance -- it was a LOT of statements, all of which you got to respond to with one (1) of the following options:
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Not applicable
And the statements were things like "The goals and values of the company are clearly communicated," and "I feel like I belong here," and many, many more. And all of the statements were things that were conceptually quite complex, not anything that could really be summed up by something like a blanket 'agree' or 'disagree.' (I answered a lot of 'neither agree nor disagree,' which always make me add in my head 'but some secret third thing, which is that this is a question that requires a long-form answer!')
But of course it wasn't a survey with a lot of nuance -- it was a LOT of statements, all of which you got to respond to with one (1) of the following options:
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Not applicable
And the statements were things like "The goals and values of the company are clearly communicated," and "I feel like I belong here," and many, many more. And all of the statements were things that were conceptually quite complex, not anything that could really be summed up by something like a blanket 'agree' or 'disagree.' (I answered a lot of 'neither agree nor disagree,' which always make me add in my head 'but some secret third thing, which is that this is a question that requires a long-form answer!')
workaday Wednesday
Apr. 30th, 2025 07:40 amSoooo... my boss is going to be on site next week for a "mandatory training." This is what I've been told about this event so far:
*In-person attendance is required. They're flying people in for this thing.
*Three full days, lunch provided.
*It's only for people who have direct reports (aka managers), but you can't attend it with anyone you report to (no hierarchical mingling!). There will be "several" trainings throughout the year to accommodate that requirement.
*It's a training about the new performance review system. (Maybe? This was implied, but vague.)
I HAVE QUESTIONS. And since speculating on what the higher-ups are doing is a time-honored company pastime**, I am making three possible guesses!
1. The meeting is about something different, and the company isn't telling attendees.
2. The meeting is about something different, and my boss isn't telling me.
3. It really is what my boss says it is, and the why is just 'corporate logic.'
[**FUN FACT: Two CEOs ago, the CEO used to do these video messages for everyone, and at the end of each message there was a song. Sort of like a 'this is what I'm listening to this week' kind of thing. HR had to ask them to stop including any songs, because people were reading too much into the song choices, lol.]
*In-person attendance is required. They're flying people in for this thing.
*Three full days, lunch provided.
*It's only for people who have direct reports (aka managers), but you can't attend it with anyone you report to (no hierarchical mingling!). There will be "several" trainings throughout the year to accommodate that requirement.
*It's a training about the new performance review system. (Maybe? This was implied, but vague.)
I HAVE QUESTIONS. And since speculating on what the higher-ups are doing is a time-honored company pastime**, I am making three possible guesses!
1. The meeting is about something different, and the company isn't telling attendees.
2. The meeting is about something different, and my boss isn't telling me.
3. It really is what my boss says it is, and the why is just 'corporate logic.'
[**FUN FACT: Two CEOs ago, the CEO used to do these video messages for everyone, and at the end of each message there was a song. Sort of like a 'this is what I'm listening to this week' kind of thing. HR had to ask them to stop including any songs, because people were reading too much into the song choices, lol.]
workaday... Thursday?
Apr. 24th, 2025 07:32 am*LOL everything was fine at work. Not even sure they noticed I wasn't there.
*I do feel a lot of sympathy for one of my coworkers, who has the unenviable role of being the person asked to "look into" every fleeting idea that pops into the heads of our bosses.
*My role is much more along the lines of saying things like 'that would take at least six weeks to get approved,' which is much longer than most of the fleeting ideas last, and also has the benefit of being true.
*I keep forgetting it's Thursday, because yesterday was my work!Monday. Gotta get ready for that Thursday morning meeting!
*haha just kidding, the Thursday morning meeting is mostly just me saying a bunch of random stuff about the projects I'm assigned
*there is no value to the Thursday morning meeting; it was created two bosses ago because that boss didn't want to boss but kept getting asked the status of my projects; so they made me do a book-report style meeting every week for everyone who asked; all I'm supposed to do is read out the status that's already shown in the project tracker
*and then the two bosses after them were just like 'idk I guess this meeting must be important let's not rock the boat'
*and I don't want to be the one to tell them that it's not, because I like to maintain the illusion
*sometimes I also update people on the drought tracker
*SPEAK TRUTHS, REVEAL NOTHING: a valid workplace strategy
*I do feel a lot of sympathy for one of my coworkers, who has the unenviable role of being the person asked to "look into" every fleeting idea that pops into the heads of our bosses.
*My role is much more along the lines of saying things like 'that would take at least six weeks to get approved,' which is much longer than most of the fleeting ideas last, and also has the benefit of being true.
*I keep forgetting it's Thursday, because yesterday was my work!Monday. Gotta get ready for that Thursday morning meeting!
*haha just kidding, the Thursday morning meeting is mostly just me saying a bunch of random stuff about the projects I'm assigned
*there is no value to the Thursday morning meeting; it was created two bosses ago because that boss didn't want to boss but kept getting asked the status of my projects; so they made me do a book-report style meeting every week for everyone who asked; all I'm supposed to do is read out the status that's already shown in the project tracker
*and then the two bosses after them were just like 'idk I guess this meeting must be important let's not rock the boat'
*and I don't want to be the one to tell them that it's not, because I like to maintain the illusion
*sometimes I also update people on the drought tracker
*SPEAK TRUTHS, REVEAL NOTHING: a valid workplace strategy
workaday Wednesday
Apr. 23rd, 2025 07:50 amSince I took an extra-extra-long weekend, this will be my first day at work this week. ::laughs nervously:: I'm sure everything will be fine!
Due to various reasons (okay, one reason, which was that I felt sick and thought coffee might make it worse), I haven't had coffee since Sunday. I miss it! Really hoping today's the day.
(PS: That heating pad from Christmas is REALLY coming in clutch this week.)
Due to various reasons (okay, one reason, which was that I felt sick and thought coffee might make it worse), I haven't had coffee since Sunday. I miss it! Really hoping today's the day.
(PS: That heating pad from Christmas is REALLY coming in clutch this week.)
what are pajamas, really
Apr. 17th, 2025 08:05 amOne of my coworkers let us know that yesterday was 'Wear Your Pajamas to Work Day,' and I am So Proud of myself for not saying anything along the lines of 'oh, I do that every day.'
I mean, if they're clothes you wear to sleep in, they're pajamas, right? But if they're clothes you wear to work, they're work clothes. If those just HAPPEN to be the same thing sometimes, then clothes must be defined by context instead of content. Which means any clothes you're wearing to work would be, by definition, work clothes, not pajamas.
So there! Definitely don't always wear my pajamas to work. That would be ridiculous!
I mean, if they're clothes you wear to sleep in, they're pajamas, right? But if they're clothes you wear to work, they're work clothes. If those just HAPPEN to be the same thing sometimes, then clothes must be defined by context instead of content. Which means any clothes you're wearing to work would be, by definition, work clothes, not pajamas.
So there! Definitely don't always wear my pajamas to work. That would be ridiculous!
workaday Wednesday
Apr. 16th, 2025 07:45 amOne of the 'new and improved' performance review metrics that was rolled out this year was 're-grading' every employee.
(IDK, I guess they put all of us in grades (aka tiers, aka they're absolutely just re-inventing the top-down hierarchy) before, but then it was a SECRET. Now they've changed how many grades there are, and it's NOT SECRET.)
Not EXACTLY secret, anyway. I was told my grade during my annual review, and after some pushing (I tried to be tactful? I am not good at it, though), I was provided a 'general overview' of the tiers. Then my boss asked if I had any questions about it.
(I did, obviously. My job title was LITERALLY listed in the grade above the one I was given. But the company had already put out a video that was VERY CLEAR in saying 'if you think you've been graded wrong, you weren't' in almost those exact words, so I definitely wasn't going to ask about THAT.)
So instead I asked, as delicately and tactfully as I could (still not very, unfortunately), if my boss was allowed to tell me if everyone on the team was the same grade. (There are only three of us.) Cue the loooooooooooooooong pause. The answer was immediately obvious. To my boss' credit, they did eventually say yes, they could tell me, and no, the rest of the team was graded differently.
IN CONCLUSION: I no longer need to feel guilty any time I feel like my coworkers have been asked to do things I haven't! (I mean, I often do still feel guilty, but at least now I can tell myself to chill out about it.) Obviously I still feel salty about this entire situation, but I'm trying very hard to see the upsides, which even I can admit are numerous.
(IDK, I guess they put all of us in grades (aka tiers, aka they're absolutely just re-inventing the top-down hierarchy) before, but then it was a SECRET. Now they've changed how many grades there are, and it's NOT SECRET.)
Not EXACTLY secret, anyway. I was told my grade during my annual review, and after some pushing (I tried to be tactful? I am not good at it, though), I was provided a 'general overview' of the tiers. Then my boss asked if I had any questions about it.
(I did, obviously. My job title was LITERALLY listed in the grade above the one I was given. But the company had already put out a video that was VERY CLEAR in saying 'if you think you've been graded wrong, you weren't' in almost those exact words, so I definitely wasn't going to ask about THAT.)
So instead I asked, as delicately and tactfully as I could (still not very, unfortunately), if my boss was allowed to tell me if everyone on the team was the same grade. (There are only three of us.) Cue the loooooooooooooooong pause. The answer was immediately obvious. To my boss' credit, they did eventually say yes, they could tell me, and no, the rest of the team was graded differently.
IN CONCLUSION: I no longer need to feel guilty any time I feel like my coworkers have been asked to do things I haven't! (I mean, I often do still feel guilty, but at least now I can tell myself to chill out about it.) Obviously I still feel salty about this entire situation, but I'm trying very hard to see the upsides, which even I can admit are numerous.
workaday Wednesday
Apr. 9th, 2025 07:30 amBUCKLE UP it's time for the quarterly 'the company that owns the company I work for is holding a meeting' meeting! (Not to be confused with the 'the company that owns the company that owns the company I work for is holding a meeting' -- that one's happening next week.)
I'm guessing that despite all the 'yay everything is great' messaging in the last meeting (December), the tone of today's meeting will be somewhat grim. BUT at least there will be enough people attending (most virtually) that I should be able to stay off-camera and on mute for the entire thing, and my face can take all the journeys it wants without anyone knowing. Gotta find those silver linings wherever we can!
I'm guessing that despite all the 'yay everything is great' messaging in the last meeting (December), the tone of today's meeting will be somewhat grim. BUT at least there will be enough people attending (most virtually) that I should be able to stay off-camera and on mute for the entire thing, and my face can take all the journeys it wants without anyone knowing. Gotta find those silver linings wherever we can!
I MADE IT BACK HOME
Mar. 27th, 2025 07:36 amIn a day filled with far too many awkward moments, perhaps the MOST AWKWARD (that I'm willing to share on the internet, lol) was when I said I'd been listening to an audiobook on the drive to the office, and this led to a brief exchange about books, and then my boss asked: "Do you like Harry Potter?"
CUE THE AWKWARD PAUSE
My brain had about a dozen thoughts at once, including 'yikes' and 'oh no this conversational minefield just became MUCH MORE DANGEROUS' and also 'is this a test?' because I am highly suspicious of any questions I'm asked at work.
I made an attempt to equivocate my way around the question until I could land on the relatively safe sub-topic of, 'I thought it was great how the books encouraged so many kids to get into reading.' And then we had a meeting to start and the conversation didn't continue. PHEW.
CUE THE AWKWARD PAUSE
My brain had about a dozen thoughts at once, including 'yikes' and 'oh no this conversational minefield just became MUCH MORE DANGEROUS' and also 'is this a test?' because I am highly suspicious of any questions I'm asked at work.
I made an attempt to equivocate my way around the question until I could land on the relatively safe sub-topic of, 'I thought it was great how the books encouraged so many kids to get into reading.' And then we had a meeting to start and the conversation didn't continue. PHEW.
workaday Wednesday
Mar. 26th, 2025 06:40 amMe, trying to get ready to drive to the office in 2025: AAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!
(Prior to the 'it's a pandemic, everyone go home' days of 2020, I'd been working at the same job for 6ish years, and the same building for 3. I didn't really think much about my morning routine; it just all happened pretty automatically. Now every time I have to go in I feel like that episode of 'I Love Lucy' where she tells him they have to go to the hospital because the baby's coming, and he totally freaks out.)
(PS: Found the video clip! Lucy Goes Into Labor, S2 E16)
(Prior to the 'it's a pandemic, everyone go home' days of 2020, I'd been working at the same job for 6ish years, and the same building for 3. I didn't really think much about my morning routine; it just all happened pretty automatically. Now every time I have to go in I feel like that episode of 'I Love Lucy' where she tells him they have to go to the hospital because the baby's coming, and he totally freaks out.)
(PS: Found the video clip! Lucy Goes Into Labor, S2 E16)
joking but serious, the story of my life
Mar. 24th, 2025 07:26 amMy workplace is doing some stuff because March is Nutrition Month (I guess?), including asking people to submit recipes that celebrate their cultural heritage. And then -- and this is truly the wildest part to me -- they're going to have a 'panel of experts' analyze all the recipes for cultural significance, nutritional value, and simplicity. And then award prizes, I guess???
IDK, the whole thing seems needlessly complicated to me, but in the spirit of workplace participation, I did consider whether I should send in a recipe. Because avocado toast must count as being culturally significant for millennials, right? It's what we got instead of job security and affordable housing! It's the 'joking but also completely serious' food of a generation!
And yes, submitting such a recipe would be A LITTLE BIT to poke gentle fun at how seriously this 'competition' (why???) is being presented by the powers that be. I like my food to be easy and fun, and I don't think making dinner has to be a big deal.
But it would also be COMPLETELY SERIOUS because I do think avocado toast has a place in the cultural record, plus it's delicious.
Also COMPLETELY SERIOUSLY I think it would be valuable to include some very simple, very customizable recipes in any collection. I think it would make any collection of recipes more widely accessible and interesting!
(And it might make people laugh, because it's also A LITTLE BIT a joke, and I think that has value too.)
(I am definitely not submitting anything. But I did think about it!)
[ETA: I re-read the announcement and realized I forgot to mention that recipes will also be judged on flavor! Gotta be delicious, nutritious, easy, and culturally relevant to win the mystery prizes!]
IDK, the whole thing seems needlessly complicated to me, but in the spirit of workplace participation, I did consider whether I should send in a recipe. Because avocado toast must count as being culturally significant for millennials, right? It's what we got instead of job security and affordable housing! It's the 'joking but also completely serious' food of a generation!
And yes, submitting such a recipe would be A LITTLE BIT to poke gentle fun at how seriously this 'competition' (why???) is being presented by the powers that be. I like my food to be easy and fun, and I don't think making dinner has to be a big deal.
But it would also be COMPLETELY SERIOUS because I do think avocado toast has a place in the cultural record, plus it's delicious.
Also COMPLETELY SERIOUSLY I think it would be valuable to include some very simple, very customizable recipes in any collection. I think it would make any collection of recipes more widely accessible and interesting!
(And it might make people laugh, because it's also A LITTLE BIT a joke, and I think that has value too.)
(I am definitely not submitting anything. But I did think about it!)
[ETA: I re-read the announcement and realized I forgot to mention that recipes will also be judged on flavor! Gotta be delicious, nutritious, easy, and culturally relevant to win the mystery prizes!]
workaday Wednesday
Mar. 19th, 2025 07:39 amI give my workplace a lot of heckling, as is my right, duty, and joy as a minion-level employee. But I've also got to give them credit for doubling down on their diversity and inclusion offerings in this moment. I don't know whether they'll keep it up, but I'm willing to celebrate every bright spot.
workaday Wednesday
Mar. 12th, 2025 07:55 amThrough a series of events that aren't really relevant to this post, it turns out that I have access to the answers that a small group of my fellow employees provided to the question "What's your Superpower of choice?"
And ONE fellow employee chose this Extremely Worrying response: "Mind Control"
REALLY?!?!?!?!?!?
WHAT?!?!?!?!?!?!?
I find this answer baffling both in the 'I'm not sure why you would want to be able to do that' sense AND in the 'I'm not sure why you would want to admit that in a semi-public forum' sense.
ANYWAY, most people picked flying, or didn't answer at all. As someone who doesn't particularly love heights, planes, travel, swooping movements, or moving quickly, I went with 'luck.' It's the practical choice!
And ONE fellow employee chose this Extremely Worrying response: "Mind Control"
REALLY?!?!?!?!?!?
WHAT?!?!?!?!?!?!?
I find this answer baffling both in the 'I'm not sure why you would want to be able to do that' sense AND in the 'I'm not sure why you would want to admit that in a semi-public forum' sense.
ANYWAY, most people picked flying, or didn't answer at all. As someone who doesn't particularly love heights, planes, travel, swooping movements, or moving quickly, I went with 'luck.' It's the practical choice!
workaday Wednesday
Feb. 26th, 2025 07:27 amIn the past four work days, my workplace has managed to include me in the following mandatory meetings:
*company meeting
*2024 performance review
*weekly meeting with manager
(There would have been a fourth meeting: the weekly team meeting, but I took last Friday as a PTO day and was mercifully absent for that one.)
It seems wildly unnecessary to have all of these meetings in such a short period of time. Especially since the main messages were:
*'we'll tell you more about what to do in 2025 in some later meeting'
*'you were given your 2024 review in January, but let's read it together for some reason'
*'there was a meeting about what's going to happen in 2025, but it was confusing, so I need to go to another meeting to ask more questions'
HOWEVER! All three of these meetings ended on time, which is amazing and wonderful and something to truly be grateful for. And that's pretty much the state of work these days!
*company meeting
*2024 performance review
*weekly meeting with manager
(There would have been a fourth meeting: the weekly team meeting, but I took last Friday as a PTO day and was mercifully absent for that one.)
It seems wildly unnecessary to have all of these meetings in such a short period of time. Especially since the main messages were:
*'we'll tell you more about what to do in 2025 in some later meeting'
*'you were given your 2024 review in January, but let's read it together for some reason'
*'there was a meeting about what's going to happen in 2025, but it was confusing, so I need to go to another meeting to ask more questions'
HOWEVER! All three of these meetings ended on time, which is amazing and wonderful and something to truly be grateful for. And that's pretty much the state of work these days!
workaday Thursday
Feb. 20th, 2025 07:54 amBOOK CLUB UPDATE: NO SURPRISES HERE
The workplace book club was introduced with mild fanfare in January, with a book selection, plans for weekly posts throughout the month, and a promised (but unscheduled) discussion to be held at a later date.
I read the book. I saw one (1) post about it on the company's online sharing place [look, it used to be google+ when I started, and it's changed SO MANY times since then that I have no idea what it's called now]. I sent an email to the nominal organizer at the start of February, sort of a 'hey, will there be a meeting? was there already a meeting? no pressure, just want to show my support' type message.
SEVERAL WEEKS LATER I received a reply. So sorry for the late reply! the email said. There was no meeting! They had emailed everyone who had RSVP'd to the month-long book club calendar invite to ask if they wanted to have one, and everyone said no.
[TO CLARIFY: I had no idea we were supposed to 'RSVP' to the month-long calendar invite. What?!]
IN CONCLUSION: The 2025 workplace book club has ended EVEN EARLIER than the previous 2018 attempt. Not even one meeting! I expect in another seven years, they'll try again, but possibly no one will know about it, since if the pattern holds, it will last for even less time, and not even reach the point of picking a book.
The workplace book club was introduced with mild fanfare in January, with a book selection, plans for weekly posts throughout the month, and a promised (but unscheduled) discussion to be held at a later date.
I read the book. I saw one (1) post about it on the company's online sharing place [look, it used to be google+ when I started, and it's changed SO MANY times since then that I have no idea what it's called now]. I sent an email to the nominal organizer at the start of February, sort of a 'hey, will there be a meeting? was there already a meeting? no pressure, just want to show my support' type message.
SEVERAL WEEKS LATER I received a reply. So sorry for the late reply! the email said. There was no meeting! They had emailed everyone who had RSVP'd to the month-long book club calendar invite to ask if they wanted to have one, and everyone said no.
[TO CLARIFY: I had no idea we were supposed to 'RSVP' to the month-long calendar invite. What?!]
IN CONCLUSION: The 2025 workplace book club has ended EVEN EARLIER than the previous 2018 attempt. Not even one meeting! I expect in another seven years, they'll try again, but possibly no one will know about it, since if the pattern holds, it will last for even less time, and not even reach the point of picking a book.